16 Jan
2004
16 Jan
'04
5:08 a.m.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:06:49 +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
It was before my time.
- Steve
To summarize:
1. LAD should be an access point for all linux audio developers
Maybe, but its not. I'm not even sure it should be. There a lot of people
who just dont have time to read LAD, and if there were even more
traffic then some existing subscribers would have to leave.
I'm not knocking LAD, but it can't (and shouldn't) speak for all linux
audio developers (and neither can or should linuxaudio.org). LAD has its
own agenda that not all linux audio developers will agree with.
LADSPA ->
Richard Furse. Although LADSPA is still _the_ example
of LAD people working together, we were not closing
in on any kind of solution in our discussions back
in 1999-2000. Richard went ahead and put the pieces
together, and ta-daa, we had a standard.
Lots of issues have been discussed before and after the standard
release. I guess there are significant contributions from at least Steve
and Paul.