28 Jan
2011
28 Jan
'11
9:30 a.m.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:19 AM, diego simak <diego.simak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've followed this conversation from the
beginning
I'm usually very quiet just reading all the emails from LAU & LAD with
a very few answers (just because my knowledge from a user and from dev
point of view is limited)
I do understand the message but i think it needs another PS:
Sarcasm
2011/1/27 Julien Claassen <julien(a)c-lab.de>de>:
Quite the contrary. We've been admirers of Werner's work for quite
some time, not only for the MusE code, but his stunning work with
Musescore.
The......warmth of the attribution is an acknowledgement of that, and
as a few other devs may attest to, we are quick to thank them for
updates and fixes, and acknowledge them in the same way.
Alex.
Hello all1
I haven't followed the complete discussion, only seen bits of it. But what
is so fundamentally wrong with that attribution? Maybe a little short and
informal and I don't understand the P.S., but don't explain, I'm sure I can
read it for myself, if I'm willing to without waisting your time and anymore
attribution, copyright and legality space here. :-)
Kind regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev