10 Mar
2004
10 Mar
'04
9:47 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:44:26AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
But it will use up two flags that may be needed later
and may clash with
future extensions, or produce binary imcompatibility. Not to mention that
it is effectivly a fork in LADSPA.
There are still 20 bits left. And we can reserve #31 for a version jump anyway.
And I think 1.1 -> 1.2 is not a fork, it isn't meant to be anyway.
I think this is a very, very bad idea.
Do you mean the proposal, or any premature implementation ?
--
FA