16 Jan
2010
16 Jan
'10
7:57 a.m.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Adrian Knoth <adi(a)drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:33:57AM +0000, alex stone
wrote:
How about talking to upstream again and trying to get things merged?
This could mean a lot of work, but in the end, nobody needs the (n+1)th
fork of something.
And while at it, make it a LV2 plugin. ;)
Cheerio
--
mail: adi(a)thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
If nobody answers the front door, knock on the back.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Adrian, no offence intended, it's been my user experience that
anything that has portaudio or portmidi involved, is prone to
challenges. I'm thinking a "pure' jack build here.
I'm not sure about hydrogen as an lv2 plugin either. I can't see where
this would be useful, although others might disagree, showing valid
use cases.
Alex.
--
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe(a)openoctave.org
development-subscribe(a)openoctave.org
The JACK
MIDI code was contribued (by me) while H2 was on a feature freeze
Gabriel, just
thinking out loud here, but do you think there's any
mileage in creating a JACK audio and midi only version of hydrogen?