8 Jan
2003
8 Jan
'03
6:30 p.m.
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 22.54, Tim Hockin wrote:
Seems like it, but I guess we'll have to see it first. If it's not
released under a BSD style or LGPL style licence, it is of little use
to us.
Also, if it isn't really usable as a complete, standalone plugin API
(I'm thinking metadata and stuff), it still requires a higher level
wrapper (XAP) to make real, usable plugins. Sounds like it's a pure,
low level DSP API, meant for use inside plugins using higher level
APIs, so I suspect it won't really function as a generic plugin API.
Either way, it sounds seriously interesting. It still has to deal
with controls, ramping, instrument control, memory management, audio
streaming and all that, so there might be some interesting solutions
to look at. (Unless it's all patented, that is... *heh*)
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
If anyone can
get to this, it would be a great idea. I might even
consider using a frequent flyer ticket for this. not sure yet.
Hrrm, Anaheim is a 6 hour drive for me (Finally! Not being in
Europe pays off!!)
Subject: FW: [mma-members] Announcement: Item
#183 Unified Audio
Plug-In Architecture
Shall we propose XAP? :)
The meeting will be held on Sunday, January 19
from 4:30 PM -
5:45 PM at the Anaheim Marriott. I'm not sure what the actual
conference room will be; so far it's only been designated as "MMA
Meeting Room A".
FUCK! I'm moving that weekend and I can't change it. Any other
California folks?
Should be interesting - perhaps XAP is in vain? If a truly
universal API appears, and it is not insane, we'd be wise to use
it, no?