18 Jan
2008
18 Jan
'08
8:14 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:13:10PM +0100, Julien Claassen wrote:
Why can't those people who discussed it here
(Dave R., Fons and probably
more - simply sit down and try to take as much as possible from the API - as
it is - and try to work this new concept around it.
Well, the two you mention have a long history of not having radically
different views... :-)
Seriously, there are three things that I profoundly dislike in MIDI.
1. The limited precision of almost all values, 7 bits or 14 with a
kludge (but even this kludge is not available in any standard
way for e.g. individual note frequencies).
2. Note events are identified by their frequency.
3. The only thing that can actually refer back to a note on event
is it's corresponding 'note off' message. It's not possible to
send a controller value that refers to a previous note-on event.
The worst result of all this, and what really drives me nuts is that
the same limits get built-in, carved in stone, into each and every
piece of sequencing software. They all perpetuate what is in fact
a form of cultural poverty "there's not quarter tones in pop music,
so they don't exist" while technically there is no more reason to
do so.
Midi-over-jack has missed the chance to fix 1) which would have
been relatively easy. And even 2) and 3) are not so difficult to
get rid of.
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.