8 Aug
2009
8 Aug
'09
5:50 p.m.
On 08/09/2009 05:44 AM, drew Roberts wrote:
On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey
wrote:
So this is a pre fork or a split or a bend but not an outright fork?
IMO, it's so close to a fork as to be almost negligible.
It's all the ground work in place but none of the follow through.
It's like a "psyche" intended to frighten the recipient without actually
doing anything specific?
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
Sorry but how exactly is this different from a
fork? Is there a guide
that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
result of your efforts?
Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this point
at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is the
original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with new text
documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking either of the
projects.)
all the best,
drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev