30 Jan
2008
30 Jan
'08
7:45 p.m.
On Jan 31, 2008 12:18 AM, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp(a)gjcp.net> wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:14 +0100, Marek wrote:
Go ahead. Elaborate.
Wait, what? Elaborate what? You're the one that came up with a
non-issue, and now you want me to explain why it is an issue?
Well you said i don't know what i'm talking about, using drugs, you'll
have to stab me, etc etc.
Now i'm asking you how you would solve this issue wrt GPL.
I'm interested to see whether you can judge that i'm talking nonsense
or not, according to your own words.
My product is a router which uses your software in an
unmodified form.
It pulls firmware directly from net. I don't offer anything for
download. Note, this would *not* be a distribution of your software,
this would be selling of my router.
How do you solve this issue?
What issue? You're using GPLed software in a manner permitted by the
licence. Where's the issue?
I already said - under the circumstances you describe, you're using GPL
sofware in a perfectly legitimate way. What is the issue to be solved?
Do you think that somehow I might want to solve the "issue" of someone
using GPLed software in a commercial product?
I honestly don't know what you're asking here. I'm not even sure you
know what you're asking.
Again, no explanation. Sigh.
Marek