24 Jun
2004
24 Jun
'04
2:40 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:10:37 -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
Ah, yes, I guess volatile should mean that. Hmmm...
- Steve
> >
inline float FlushToZero( volatile float f )
> > {
> > f += 9.8607615E-32f;
> > return f - 9.8607615E-32f;
> > }
That actually looks nice... since thanks to writing "volatile float f",
the optimizer should not touch it.. it' the same thing than
when one accsses directly to the harware using pointers
to memmaped registers.. lack of using "volatile" often
ends up in non-working code..