29 Jul
2011
29 Jul
'11
5:44 p.m.
Hello Gabriel,
On 07/29/2011 04:32 PM, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Olivier Guilyardi
<list(a)samalyse.com> wrote:
1. I don't have time to work on this. 2. That's a task for the core LV2 devs IMO
and I'm not part of the LV2 team. 3. If I became part of the team, I wouldn't
see things from the outside anymore, which is useful to give practical ideas.
I have spent some time trying to get a global figure of plugins in general, and
this SDK question comes from this point of view. An external point of view.
--
Olivier
possible routes to host LV2 plugins. This is
consistent in /principle/, but do
you not something feel like such "modularity" can be confusing, when compared
to
existing major plugin technologies which provide everything as an SDK? Do you
not feel like a complete LV2 SDK would be more developer friendly, in /practice/?
Sure, this would be a Good Thing. It just needs someone to
propose/implement it. Olivier? :-)