20 Nov
2003
20 Nov
'03
8:27 p.m.
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 15.53, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Roger Larsson <roger.larsson(a)norran.net>
writes:
Something like this... some build and test bugs corrected.
/RogerL
--
Roger Larsson
Skellefteå
Sweden
I have an idea!
rt_monitor is running mlockall and I avoided
* dynamic memory allocation
* system calls
- If I split the function into server and monitor (two threads) it
would be even better.
So rt_monitor itself should never get stuck requesting more memory, nor
get stuck in a system call getting stuck on another process requesting
more memory.
Sounds like a good idea.