-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: gene heskett<gheskett(a)wdtv.com>
To: linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 01:57 PM
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 03:43:40 pm Chris
Cannam did opine:
> On 27 January 2011 19:38, Christopher
> Cherrett<ccherrett(a)openoctave.org>
wrote:
>> I suspect there is much more to this puzzle than attribution.
>
> No, really not. Attribution is incredibly important to many open
> source developers, partly because there are so few tangible
> benefits involved with open source work, and partly because the
> force of the licenses we use (particularly the GPL) depends on
> being confident about the ownership of copyright. It matters a
> great deal to people if you take someone's work and represent it
> as your own.
>
> And it's a pity, because a situation like this or the earlier
> Rosegarden fork ought to be beneficial to everybody. With
> Rosegarden, your project's focus was different from that of any of
> our core developers and, although we like to keep people happy, we
> really weren't able to spend the time to do the things you wanted.
> Forking ensured that people who liked things "your way" had
> somewhere else to go, which made things better for them and simpler
> for us.
>
> In light of that, it's a great shame that the resulting new project
> should then give us such a sour impression -- and the same thing is
> true again here. Your casual attitude to other people's work means
> that I and probably many others would avoid working with you again,
> but that negative feeling could have been avoided with such a tiny
> amount of thought and even less work.
>
>
> Chris
+1000
This very well said, Chris. I personally do not have a dog in this
fight, but had that been some of my now elderly code, I think I
would be justified in calling this new effort out, as has now been
more than amply done by others here, and the point _has_ been made.
Unfortunately, I am probably doing little except contributing to
the roar of disapproval by the crowd.:(
To Alex and your crew:
It is likely that this contretemps will not fully settle until such
time as the proper attributions have been restored and a new release
containing those attributions has been made.
Defensive attitudes do not cut it, performance does.
A new release? What exactly do you expect?
The correct attributions, possibly with a sentence or 2 describing how
the fork came to be in the README in download able package. What, 10
minutes work plus the repacking?