14 Mar
2006
14 Mar
'06
3:14 p.m.
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 19:56 +0100, torbenh(a)gmx.de wrote:
so you say that i should not htonl the floats i copy
from my net
buffer
to the jack-port ?
i doubt, this is a great performance impact.
These were just suggestions... of course the performance impact is
small. But when a code path will be called on every sample then even a
0.01% speedup is worthwhile.
when i change the packet format next time, i could
change that to byte
swap on a PPC. but considering that PPCs are generally slower than x86
nowadays, this would create more cpu load on a jack-network.
i am puzzled. did anybody actually test it ?
well at least there is some netjack thread now :/
Well, you did post your announcement to a development list - if you only
wanted testers you should have only sent to LAU ;-)
Lee