On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote;wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Iain Duncan
<iainduncanlists(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Thanks, that clarifies things a lot for me. I
didn't think about the disk
seeking issue. (For my app, my intent is to have everything in RAM for
live
playing ). Was the intent of the jack looping
transport proposal to allow
clients to know that they were looping and do seamless looping too if
they
are able?
yes.
Off the official ardourd-jack roadmap record, do you think there's a
realistic chance of this still happening in the next few years? At least
for Ardour? I might code such that I can use ardour with it when available
if that's in the works because that would be super cool, but I totally get
that it may be a very low priority for Ardour dev.
iain