21 Dec
2002
21 Dec
'02
12:23 p.m.
On Friday 20 December 2002 12.50, Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:04:46 +0100, David Olofson
wrote:
Why would you care if you take PITCH and output PITCH? (Event
processors.)
On Thursday 19 December 2002 23.01, Frank van de
Pol wrote:
No, not optional, mandatory. On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:01:57PM +0100, David
Olofson wrote:
Yeah, that was my first thought. Make 0.0 <==> 440 Hz, period.
It has been suggested that it be a "system variable" or
something, but since we have linear pitch control anyway, you may
as will implement it as an optional TUNING control input on the
plugins that care. (Sequencers with direct PITCH output and scale
converters would care.) What frequency does PITCH 0.0 correspond to?
unadjusted pitch, A4 = 440 Hz I think this would be a much easier
way to ensure that global tuning works than having the
sequencers/midi converters skew thier note->pitch outputs.
Yes, but then *everyone* has to implement it. No big deal, probably,
but it's still an extra parameter that (almost) everyone has to deal
with.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---