22 Jun
2010
22 Jun
'10
11:01 a.m.
Excerpts from Jens M Andreasen's message of 2010-06-22 08:36:53 +0200:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Typical lossless codecs manage to get typical music down to about at
most 50-60%, here's a graph and stuff:
http://web.inter.nl.net/users/hvdh/lossless/lossless.htm
--
Regards,
Philipp
--
"Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen
offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan
And is there a snowballs chance in hell that this
is un-encumbered?
<http://electronicdesign.com/tabid/57/default.aspx?topic=algorithm_delivers_lossless_compression_to_adc_samples&catpath=&fltrTitle=&fltrSummary=&fltrPublication.aspx?nl=1>
from TFA:
: Implemented in a DSP chip or microprocessor, this simple compressor
: requires about 50 instructions per sample. However, lossless
: compression ratios fall between 1.3:1 and 2:1 on baseband signals.
So a size of 75% expected and on occasion down to 50% after compression.
How is that compared to existing implementations?
--
jedes mal wenn du eine quintparallele verwendest
tötet bach ein kätzchen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43RdmmNaGfQ