27 Oct
2002
27 Oct
'02
11:21 a.m.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 02:41:17 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
Yes, I'm not sure what the interrealtion between the cabinet and code is
though - I think a simple cabinet delay line + your IIR filter would be a
good place to start.
I think it was a reaction betwen the dc offset filters. Something was very
close to instability.
> >used
for all the stages, I suspect a chebychev would be better for the
> >output, it would also alow us to model different amps with the same code.
forgot to ask ... you mean emulate a 'preamp', filter and
apply a 'power amp' [and filter again] and a 'cabinet'
stage i guess? just tried it, indeed it does. what i like especially
is that
it sounds quite 'juicy' like good distortion is supposed to.
the attack phase is slightly better than with my previous
setup, though there's still some auto-wah. still with the
I've fixed the wah noise in the second one I posted, it was due to a
combination of things (lack of inverters, excessive valve settings, lack
of lowcut).
I'm having
a problem than when the input is 0, the output is infinite. I'm
not sure if its a result of the optimisations I did, or it it would do
that anyway.
should be the optimization, i'm getting clean zero out for
zero in with your last public release. i still remember the green skies a M$VC optimized POV
binary produced, since that day i'm a bit skeptical about
compiler optimizations.
This was more of a maths optimisation than a compiler optimisation.
- Steve