On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Kjetil S. Matheussen
<k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> wrote:
Thanks to all. Those sounds like good arguments.
I'm still a little bit reluctant against wavex
though, because googling for the wavex format
hardly gives any relevant hits.
But I guess it's better than wav anyway, so
I'm going to change something. Are you sure
there's no other format that might be a
better alternative than wavex?
And I also wonder if wavex are able
to handle >4GB files? (I couldn't find
any spec about the format on the net)
Because if wavex is not able to handle
more than 4>GB files I have to enable
the same workaround as for wav files.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
you get a lot more useful hits on google with WAVE_FORMAT_EXTENSIBLE
than wavex it seems.
Loki