11 Oct
2014
11 Oct
'14
9:55 p.m.
"Even if someone some day writes a
perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother
to try it."
Not necessarily true.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org>
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:08:10PM +0200, Jeremy
Jongepier wrote:
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
You can partly blame me, I initially packaged
this plugin for KXStudio
which made it more accessible for users. I should have a) checked the
source better and b) tested the resulting binary better as it doesn't
remotely do the job the way Zita-AT1 does. Partial comfort might be that
others probably recognized the flaws too and the package didn't survive
time. I'll see what I can do to have the remaining packages and source
code removed.
OK, thanks.
What remains (and I don't blame you for that), is a bunch of users
believing that zita-*** is crap. Even if someone some day writes a
perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother
to try it.
As for the violation of the license, don't
give in to the Jeff Glatt's
of this world.
I won't. Judging from hist posts on LM he must be a complete idiot.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev