5 Jan
2014
5 Jan
'14
7:52 p.m.
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:50:52 +0100 Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 00:29 +0100, Dominique Michel
wrote:
Please, no. c is a constant with the unit(!) m/s. m and s are no
variables... And the m in [c] = m/s is not the same as the m in E =
m*c².
- Arnold
And classical physics is even worst. In Einstein
formula e=mc^2, the
only term for which we have a definition is c...
For e, it is no definition, only equations which are not definitions
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/E%3Dmc%C2%
B2-explication.svg/220px-E%3Dmc%C2%B2-explication.svg.png
The Definition for E is m*c². By your explanation we would als have no
definition for c, since c also is an equation, c is m/s (another m ;).
The only differences are that some values are constants and others are
variables.