29 Apr
2010
29 Apr
'10
3:49 p.m.
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:36:43 +0400, Louigi Verona wrote:
This is exactly how I thought it can be done! Great Paul, really nice job
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Louigi Verona wrote:
>
>> "you can swap qtractor for ardour, or anything else for that matter
and
>> the latency will be exactly the same
systematic. a client can only
process
the results of its own outputs or sends in the _next_
process cycle."
Ha! Rui, that makes sense. Now I think I get it. Indeed.
I wonder if there is an easy way to compensate for this after the
recording took place.
Ardour specifically has a "nudge by period size" (since that is the
offset that results) for precisely this purpose.
you did!
I think Rui is planning to implement something of that sort as well.
do i? :)
anyway, while on the clip properties dialog you can always alter the clip
start-time manually, in frames
cheers
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org