20 May
2003
20 May
'03
6:33 a.m.
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
:-) :-)
This is what I
expected, but it may shock C++ purists, ...
The C++ Standard doesn't mention dynamic linking, therefore any result
whatsoever would conform to the standard. (It's "undefined behaviour", so
C++ purists would expect nasal demons ... ;-) It should be possible to have one copy of the static
data by storing S's
static data into a common s.so which is linked to by the other two .so's.
Yes, that would do the trick. Not that the double instantiation is a problem,
in fact it suits me very well.
Thanks for your reply !
FA