On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 06:35:44PM +0200, Melanie
wrote:
Hi,
it's backwards in a "numerical" sense, in that the numbers increase
with one slider type, but decrease with another, using the same
command.
However, UI designers don't think in numbers, but associations.
Left is generally associated with up, right with down, as we read left
to right, top to bottom. Therefore, up MUST map to left, down MUST map
to right, otherwise, non-mathematically minded people get uttely
confused.
I couldn't find anything on the web abou this.
But I asume the behaviour was thought out for
scrollbars and transfered to sliders.
With scrollbars scrolling lets say a table, the vertical scrollbar
has top = start, bottom = end. Horizontal scrollbar left = start,
right = end. Wheeling up on vertical sliders means scrolling
toward the vertical start. Wheeling up on the horizontal slider
should therefor mean scrolling to the horizontal start -> scrolling
left.
Very interesting. You are probably correct.
But there's nothing to scroll with sliders.
They're not about
a position in space.
Today might well have been the first time I used the wheel
on common sliders, and it felt backwards!
Agreed. I can understand why Microsoft (and thus QT and GTK) chose to