Re: [LAD] A small article about tools for electronic musicians

Louigi Verona wrote: I don't agree completely. I'm doing several kinds of music, from hardrock and jazz playing guitars made of wood, to electronic music "constructed" by the sequencer. The only real annoying issue to me, is MIDI jitter when using the absolutely needed external equipment, as I often pointed out, there are no emulations, for no OS, for e.g. CME microchips used by Oberheim, Roland, Sequential etc.. Coders like Fons do say that this jitter shouldn't be audible, but it is, it's breaking every groove. Btw. jitter is a problem for other OS too, excepted of some very expensive solutions or for very oldish Computers such as the C64 or Atari ST. I don't agree that electronic musicians do use overloaded effect chains. An experienced electronic musician should be an experienced audio engineer too. I do agree that for other OS there are "better" FX, but even for those OS there aren't effects that reach the quality of 19" rack FX. There's a limit for the quality of Linux FX at the moment, but OTOH listen to electronic productions, independent and mainstream, both are produced with "better" FX, but at the end most productions are in the bobo because of the idiotic usage of multi-band compressors. The disadvantages of Linux will give us the chance to focus to the more important things. Some time ago I pointed out, that music doesn't need automation for mixers, musicians need to control the dynamic etc. by playing OR BY EDITING the instruments. Full ACK because of the GUIs, that's why I e.g. do use Qtractor instead of Ardour + Rosegarden and I'm always whining about basics like panning samples e.g. for fluidsynth. Today Linux audio lacks regarding to user friendliness OTOH other OS do lack because of ethics. Btw. I experienced that Linux do need much more resources, than other OS does, but IMO today this isn't a problem any more. Rakarrack A very good Linux app, unfortunately similar to Qtractor, Jconv(olver) and others, it has been treated as an orphan by distros, even by audio distros, while users bagged to include packages. And again the GUI, a problem for e.g. Jconv, there is a GUI, but this GUI has disadvantages. Btw. it's needed that FX can be synced to sequencers, when changing the tempo delay edited by ms is bad, it's needed that FX can be synced by notes, instead of ms. "Some decade ago composers did not have a whole lot more toys to tinker with." This isn't true, 19" equipment was more expensive, but even today no OS do reach the possibilities of this equipment. "it can synthesize any sound you want" no real and no virtual synth is able to do this, you need several synth. You are aware that you e.g. don't need to roll knobs, but that you instead could move the mouse up and down? I agree, even a ping-pong delay is hard to do, or better completely impossible, if it should be a very clean and hard ping-pong delay. "in the hardware world a composer could've had only one or two to use for several of his albums" No, sharing synth with friends, having one expensive, but in addition low cost synth, because not all sounds needs to be fat. Aaaaargh, could you please add "Change theme to white" at top of your articles? 2 cents, Ralf