17 May
2009
17 May
'09
4:51 p.m.
On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:14:26 -0400
drew Roberts <zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 07:31:03 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Currently 1) is possible, don't know about jack2, gave up on it for the
time being.
Philipp
1. I definitely want to be able to terminate
qjackctl
without stopping jackd, even if that jackd was started
by qjackctl. This used to be possible.
Indeed it did. I used to do it all the time. I have noticed I had
problems with this recently but figured my forgetteror was working in
high gear.
It should certainly be possible to:
1. start qjackctl with a running jack and have it gain control over
that jack and then be able to quit that qjackctl and leave jack
running.
2. start qjackctl, start jack from qjackctl, quit qjackctl leaving
jack running.
Are either of these now impossible by design and if so, why?
all the best,
drew