4 Mar
2004
4 Mar
'04
1:42 p.m.
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 09:57, Matthias Nagorni wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Uwe Koloska wrote:
The categorisation is well worth it though (and would be a really nice
thing to have in AMS actually)
Any objections to RDF support in AMS for the LADSPA selector? The
search is a really nice feature, but sometimes I just want to see all my
chorus plugins, or whatever, and searching is just too inconvenient.
On the other hand, the list organized by library is a handy feature too
(that lrdf-using hosts I've seen seem to lack), especially when you get
a new plugin set and want to try things out.
Maybe a tabbed dialog with both views? Or a mode toggle of some kind?
-Dave
isn't the right thing to do to use the RDF
metatadata?
The combination of the very simple LADSPA api with something as
complicated as RDF seems a bit odd to me. I would wish if there was a
simpler solution.