3 Oct
2002
3 Oct
'02
9:05 a.m.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:38:33 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
Not that this is a good thing, it should be fixed. I didn´t check to see
if there was a client name query function. If so I will use that, if not I
will probably just move to always using bridge-<pid>. ¿comments?
Sig term (should) cause the cleanup handler to be called, nothing will
happen to the process other than that IIRC. ITs up to you what you do with
the signal, but its polite to exit afterwards ;)
- Steve
That is just
becuase it tried to connect as brdige, and if it cant tries
bridge-<pid>
ok, i could have thought of that myself.... Yeah, thats
not fixable. Making them not crash is probably better.
I'd like to get to the bottom of your segfual problem. I though id
probably fixed it.
just to clarify, i mean killall -TERM, not killall -KILL. out of
curiousity, is there a way to tell the scheduler not to pre-empt the
process until the port cleanup is completed ? (sorry if this is a dumb
question, i don't know much about unix programming...)