11 Jul
2004
11 Jul
'04
8:04 a.m.
* Andrew Morton <akpm(a)osdl.org> wrote:
Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu> wrote:
nono, i mean the existing ones. (it's 116 not 200) There's no plan to
add another 100, you've seen all the ones we found to be necessary for
this.
Ingo
For all the
other 200 might_sleep() points it doesnt matter much.
Sorry, but an additional 100 might_sleep()s is surely excessive for
debugging purposes, and unneeded for latency purposes: all these sites
are preemptible anyway.