2 Aug
2009
2 Aug
'09
10:20 a.m.
Arnout Engelen wrote:
I'm not quite sure whether I understand you
correctly, but it seems you're
not entirely right here.
If you don't have the copyright to a piece of code you wrote, for example
because you wrote it for your employer, then this means you are *not allowed*
to distribute this code. Not under the GPL, and not under whatever other
license either.
To distribute the code, you must either get the copyright on the work back,
or get permission from the actual copyright holder (employer, institution) to
do so.
You misunderstood my broken English. GPL only allows a copyleft, that's
why no institute or professor can use GPL licensed code and take on the
copyright.
Of course, it's quite possible that the students
in Prof.
Keller's case were actually paid or otherwise compensated
for this work.
As I have written before, less college tuitions are similar to being
paid. In Germany unfortunately only the privileged population is able to
study. I'm highly gifted and on Germany there's a special regulation for
financial aid by the law, but even this only can be used if you are some
kind of privileged person. To make it available for even less privileged
people there are cooperation with companies, that make college tuitions
less expensive. This still is a ethical problem, but the world isn't a
fair place, there is no god who ordered that things should be ethical.
The only thing we can do to make the world a better place for this issue
is to keep knowledge open, that's the spirit of FLOSS and that's why
there is the GPL. I don't think any institute is allowed to take on a
copyright by using GPL licensed code.
Ralf