15 Jan
2003
15 Jan
'03
12:52 a.m.
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 04.01, Paul Davis wrote:
i'd like to remind the folks involved in the XAP
discussion that it
would be really, really, really useful to get some summary
documentation on where the design process stands and what has been
accomplished thus far. if you can provide this, i will need it by
3pm EST on thursday at the absolute latest.
Ouch. Well, unless someone's been busy, we'll need to write something
virtually from scratch.
Either way, how much detail would be needed? I suppose one should at
least mention the timestamped events, control ramping, the decoupling
of note ID from note pitch and that kind of stuff, but at this point,
I don't think we have enough stuff finalized, or enough time to write
about the details.
also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please
critique
this:
http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf
I think the list of highlight would look cleaner with bullets and
left justified text, and I'm not sure about the horizontal separator
bar crossing the vertical one on the first page.
Other than that, it looks great!
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---