13 Dec
2002
13 Dec
'02
9:51 a.m.
David Olofson wrote:
Yes, I know. The thing that strikes the viewer first is how the entirety
looks out. After that people tend to start perceiving the small clicks
in the picture.
Amen :)
-a
On Thursday 12 December 2002 14.45, Antti Boman
wrote:
Definitely, and as much as I would like to see people concentrate on
coding, it's great to see the marketing side develop alongside.
Whatever. This shouldn't be the forum for me
blabbing about
graphics :)
*hehe* Well, I started it - and anyway, "marketting" of our to-be
standard instrument plugin API is of common intrerest to most of us,
isn't it? Looks good, and
can be made very good. Another thing I'd consider
testing is making the loop in P a little more narrow. There's lots
of space inside, whereas other stuff in the logo is very dense.
Yes, I've considered that too. It's easy enough to just drag the
control points around, so it's just a matter of seeing what should be
done. It's not a matter of dimensions, but rather *percepted*
dimensions of things. -Antti
"No, I'm not a graphics designer" Boman
Well, the way I like to think about most things is that if you can
tell good from bad, there's hope! The rest is just about motivation
and training. :-)