25 Jan
2008
25 Jan
'08
3:02 p.m.
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:42 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 19:05:49 schrieb
Thorsten Wilms:
It's simple: That is why LS is neither Open Source or Free Software *
Claiming otherwise is intentionally misleading deception.
Complaining about it (again...) is just a stupid waste of time.
We know all of this already. Move on, list, move on. ;)
-DR-
(* Some reasonable people care, some reasonable people don't, BFD)
I don't quite see what would stop a company
from bundling LS with
commercial content, stating that LS is included as a freebie.
It's simple: as soon as it's bundled with commercial content, say on a medium
they want money for, LS would be part of a commercial product, thus exactly
what the exception prohibits.