Convolution with a constant convolution kernel (constant over time)
gives you the response of a time-invariant system to the input signal. A
Leslie is clearly not time-invariant..
Flo
On 07/26/2012 06:51 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:
Hello everyone!
I have just asked myself, if it is a good idea to use an IR of a
Leslie for simulating a Leslie. Correct me, if I'm bloody stupid, but
working on the basics of convolution, it doesn't look promising. Since
you take the IR of the Leslie and then apply the full IR to each
sample, meaning, that you might get more of a whirling reverb? Or is
there another technique, to apply an IR and cycles. Just one "sample"
of the IR to one sample of the input signal.
If I am completely wrong, a simple no will suffice. My knowledge of
this is basic. I've only got some knowledge from a lecture called
"signal theory' to back me up and it should probably be called "an
introduction to" or "basics of" at that. :-)
Warm regards
Julien
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable;
Free And Jubilating Amazement Revels, Dancing On - FLOWERS!
====== Find my music at ======
http://juliencoder.de/nama/music.html
.....................................
"If you live to be 100, I hope I live to be 100 minus 1 day,
so I never have to live without you." (Winnie the Pooh)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev