Hi,
I have just finished two XSL stylesheets for converting specimen banks
to the save format used by petri-foo, so a user can easily switch to
petri-foo:
https://github.com/residuum/specimen2petri-foo
There are two stylesheets, depending on your locale settings, i.e. if
your locale uses comma or dot as decimal separator (if 1/2 is saved as
0.5 or 0,5 on your system).
If there are any other decimal separators out there your copy
s2p_comma.xsl and replace strings "0," and "1," to your settings. Do not
do that with s2p_dot.xsl, because necessary version information for XML
and XSL use strings like "1.0" etc.
Standard sample rate is set to 44.1 kHz, if you want to change to
another value, just edit the value in line 6.
If you encounter any bugs, open an issue on Github or send me an email.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
"Spielen Sie Strip Schnipp-Schnapp?" (Adam Weishaupt to Johann
Wolfgang von Goethe in: Robert Shea & Robert A. Wilson, The Golden
Apple)
http://www.residuum.org/
Hi Maximilian,
Thanks for your test and report.
I cannot reproduce the bug which you reported, with:
- Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)
- Linux kernel 3.12-1-amd64
- mplayer2 2.0-701-gd4c5b7f-2
- All of BeBoB devices which I have
- $ mplay -ao alsa:device=hw=1 /usr/share/sounds/alsa/*
I believe 'verbose' option for mplayer may help our debugging.
Regards
Takashi Sakamoto
Hello
WORLD is a free software speech synthesizer on the basis of a Vocoder.
It has been widely used as a backend for UTAU[1] but it should be also
possible to use it as a backend for eSpeak and other accessibility
and/or music applications such as the "Singing Computer"[2]. My modified
version of WORLD uses the well known vorbis codec for compression. The
world4espeak synthesizer is interface compatible to MBROLA, and can be
used to synthesize both singing and speech in real time on a modern
computer. It is hosted at gitorious.org [3]. Currently there are no
voices yet, a manual how to create voices will be published soon.
Tobias Platen
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utau
[2] http://devel.freebsoft.org/singing-computer
[3] https://gitorious.org/sekai
Hi,
I have played around with petri-foo the first time, and I am thinking
about switching from specimen to it.
Is there a utility to convert specimen banks to petri-foo banks? As far
as I can tell, it is a simple XML transformation, and I would try that,
if such a utility does not exist.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
"Ich komme aus dem Staunen nicht heraus."
"Dann bleib halt drin, du Seppel"
(Dietmar Dath - Die Abschaffung der Arten)
http://www.residuum.org/
Since this didn't make it yet to the LAD list, I thought I'd better forward it -
---
Hi all,
The Linux Audio Conference submissions deadline has been extended! It is
now February 3rd, 2014 (23:59 HAST)
So, if you were considering to submit a paper but couldn't make up your
mind yet, here is your chance to become active! Never forget that this
conference lives through the people participating in it.
February 3rd is the new deadline for all submission types: papers,
music, installations, workshop proposals.
Check out the link below for more info:
http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2014/participation
Please spread this information to anyone who might be interested.
If you have any questions, drop us a line at lac(a)linuxaudio.org
We are looking forward to seeing you in Karlsruhe in May!
Thanks,
The LAC2014 organization team
On 01/21/2014 07:10 PM, John Hammen wrote:
>> Then they should wait until their distro or someone else provides
>> > >a package. Or pay someone to do the work for them, just as they
>> > >have to for commercial software, or for the mechanic you mention.
>
> (...)
>
> the idea being: a person whose paid responsibility it is to make us
> LAUs happy with fresh new packages and, ideally also work with folks
> upstream on build sanity issues. Filipe, would you be willing to
> supervise such a person, feed them the less fun parts of what you do
> and check their work?
If the community is willing to pay for it, sure.
But I find that a bit hard to believe...
There's a difference on how KXStudio repositories are done vs regular
debian/ubuntu repos.
Debian and Ubuntu usually build against a specific version, and don't
usually do backports.
on KX repos I'm starting build all packages the same way (ie, the
generic linux builds), and update software very often (sometimes minutes
after release :D ).
I hate when distros only package new stuff for the their newest,
unreleased/testing/upcoming version and completely ignore the users
running stable versions... :(
Recently, I experimented with Debian sid, which use systemd. Systemd
idea is nice, but its implementation is a catastrophe. It is more than
one year I am using the kernel cgroups on gentoo to get rt scheduling
with JACK, that without any trouble.
On Debian, this is just impossible, because whatever I try, systemd
insist to put what it think is good to have into the rt cgroup, which
soon or later result in a complete system freeze with even dead magic
keys. After loosing my time a few days with this, I removed Debian and
installed gentoo instead.
I found the reason here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1063354
"Lennart Poettering:
Well, this feature is... completely irrelevant for normal desktop
people.
...
In fact, I just prepped a patch to systemd to move every service and
every user session into its own cgroup in the 'cpu' hierarchy (in
addition to the group it already creates in the 'systemd' hierarchy)."
Another completely idiotic stuff of this guy.
The point of the cgroups is it is possible to setup them for
whatever use will be made with a computer, and this guy think he have
the insane and pretentious capability to decide for every single user
of the use they will made with their computers, and he is suggesting
users doing something else are abnormal. He must be stopped!
Regards,
Dominique
Hello,
Does anyone know if anything has emerged from
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/fundamen…
or, what alternative solutions for doing the same thing exist today?
I know I have
#ifdef __clang__
# define REALTIME __attribute__((annotate("realtime")))
#else
# define REALTIME
#endif
in my code and was tinkering with an implementation capable of doing
this at some point, but can't dig up the details, or whatever system I
was using to do it.
It would be oh so very nice to be able to statically verify that code is
real-time safe...
--
dr