Hi there
I am selling at low price an RME Digi96/8 PAD with its daughter board
*AEB4-I* allowing to record 8 tracks at a time. This is a PCI card not
PCI-e, and works very well under Linux systems. You can watch the specs
on the 'old' RME site :
http://www.rme-audio.de/old/english/aeb/aeb48i.htm
I can't use it no more because I use now a laptop exclusively.
If interested, make me an offer and I'll check for shipping (I live in
France). I will also supply a multijack cable 4 stereo<->8 mono.
Thanks
Hi
I like to announce a new release of GxPlugins.lv2
GxPlugins.lv2 is a set of mostly analogue guitar pedal simulations as
LV2 plugins, simulated with the guitarix ampsim toolkit.
This release add the GxCreamMachine, GXValveCaster and the GxBoobTube to
the set, and fix a issue with the bypass state under automation conditions.
I hope they may be useful for the one or the other.
Build instruction and screenshots may be found here:
https://github.com/brummer10/GxPlugins.lv2
the release tar.gz file is located here:
https://github.com/brummer10/GxPlugins.lv2/releases
regards
hermann
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Will Godfrey wrote:
> I've just been told about this.
> https://www.midi.org/articles-old/the-midi-manufacturers-association-mma-an…
>
> Looks like we might have quite a lot of work to do :/
While the 5pin din may be gone (not really, musicians like vintage gear), MIDI
1.0 is not dead. It apears it has taken a sledge hammer to get people to use
VST3 and the MMA doesn't really have the same power. I think that MIDI 1.0 is
going to be around for a long time yet and that all new controllers will have
the abillity to send MIDI 1.0. In my experience as a musician, I meet a lot of
piano players for whom the difference bewteen MIDI 1 and MIDI 2 is just a
number (like 192k ADC) and would not affect their performance. However, I have
not met very many keyboard artists aside from those who work from their bedroom
and who's music I only hear on youtube, soundcloud, etc. I do not know how much
difference MIDI 2 would make for most of these people either. Epecially
concidering how many of them use either their qwerty kb to enter notes or a one
or two octave unit without even velocity...
In fact MIDI 2 seems to be a thing mostly for non-kb instruments or computer
generated material (most of which is probably using CV instead of MIDI anyway).
MIDI 1 was huge, My DX7 supported MIDI before the spec was complete. It is easy
to show off in the music store and sell. I expect the switch to MIDI 2 will be
a much longer road, very hard to show off from a keyboard.
Well thats my opinion anyway.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
I've just read an item on "The Register" about a network connected high
performance oscilloscope... with no security. That's as in Zero, None, Keine.
That might not seem a big deal, except that this sort of kit tends to reside in
research labs, so evilCorp (tm) could snoop on what a competitor is working on,
and pretty quickly work out not only what it is, but how well it's performing.
Said evilCorp could then plant some nasty that casually looks around to see
what other kit is on the network. Presumably this also potentially opens a door
to sabotage.
Anyway, that got me thinking (yes I know)
Has anyone thought of connecting an AD converter to a Raspberry Pi to make a
high resolution, but comparatively low bandwidth oscilloscope for audio work?
Say 16bit 500k. I'm thinking it could possibly be connected via I2C or SPI,
both of which are supported on the Pi...
or even {cough} ethernet {cough}
BTW I'm not talking about connecting to bitscope - that only has 8bit resolution
and the module itself has no gain control and is easily overloaded :(
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
I have a need to run three osc2midi clients (m2o) on a single JACK
server. Is there a way to customize their JACK port names? I can
engineer to use osc2midi, osc2midi-01, and osc2mid-02, i.e., the
automatic JACK-given names, but I was hoping for something more
self-documenting. I took a look at jackdriver.c, but did not find where
I could insert a JACK port name string.
--
Jonathan E. Brickman jeb(a)ponderworthy.com <mailto:jeb@ponderworthy.com>
   (785)233-9977
Hear us at ponderworthy.com <http://ponderworthy.com/> -- CDs and MP3
available! <http://ponderworthy.com/ad-astra/ad-astra.html>
Music of compassion; fire, and life!!!
Hi all.
Next meeting at c-base is on Tuesday 2019-01-08. As usual I'll be in
the mainhall from 20:00.
Main mail discussion thread in LAU...
Cheers
/Daniel
Hey all,
some of you (e.g. users of free.fr [1]) are currently seeing problems
with the LAD/LAU mailing lists. It seems to be triggered by those mail
servers still trying to negotiate handshakes using obsolete and unsafe
SSLv3 ciphers.
Several of you might have received an unsubscription notice from the
mailing list. Please note, that this is not done out of malice, but
because after several connection drops, mailman will automatically kick
subscribers off the list - which is usually good for non-existing
mail hosts or mail addresses.
However, in this particular instance I think it is due to us not
allowing those SSLv3 ciphers anymore (most mail providers actually
don't) and have not done so since the beginning of the year
(configuration-wise nothing has changed significantly in quite some time
either, which is even more pointing in an outwards direction).
The only solution to this - to my opinion - is to fix your mail server
setup (if you operate your own mail server) or ask your mail provider to
fix theirs (if you are using someone else's services).
You can validate the functionality of your TLS setup [2] before and/or
afterwards.
If both are non-viable options for you, I suggest switching to a mail
provider, that has a more well-maintained and configured mail server
setup (as we're able to deliver to other mail providers just fine).
Best,
David
[1] https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/free.fr
[2] https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/
--
https://sleepmap.de
