1 Apr
2011
1 Apr
'11
7:07 p.m.
Hi all,
Op den Freedag 01 April 2011 Klock 10:59:05 hett Rui Nuno Capela schreven:
On 04/01/2011 09:34 AM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
this is exactly the idea behind a library. it serves functionality, and above
that, one can release/create the (software) ideas, without worring the basic
functionality every sound software is needed.
so many people on this list had reinvended the wheel/soundengine again and
again.
And for me, the question will be: what is in and what is out off the scope of
such a library. But this is a different discussion.
It would be much easier for all of us, to have a well accepted library with
the basic functionality. and easier means tested and proven by lots of apps
and users.
bye c~
On 04/01/2011 07:23 PM, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
i have a feeling that this is way more related to mixxx than to qtractor
(beside the the naming similarity)
cheers Ok First of all, I'm NOT planning on making
tX an "Ableton Live on
Linux". I actually want to keep the basic workflow of tX and take care
of some shortcomings:
- optional Per turntable stereo-jack outputs (got that working, with
my own mixer design)
- LV2 support
- OSC support
- Rubberband support (working in parts, length of slave turntables get
adjusted to master turntable)
- Automatic detection of Beatpattern (don't know yet which lib to take)
- Take out the sequencing stuff (better done by some external app e.g
seq24, Ardour3 via osc/midi )
- Eventual change to Qt for the Gui (as a programmer, i love Qt), but
that for the far Future
So actually It should rather go along the lines of Traktor DJ (from
NI) (with more than 2 turntables), than Live. I'd also like to
incorporate NI idea of using a physical turntable to control tX
(scratching etc.)
Gerald
So, I wonder why you choose to work with tX when Rui has started a long
way on this path with qTracktor?