my apologies to everyone involved in bad cross-posting practices on my
part, particularly Fons. i promise i'll try not to let it become a
habit in the future.
[Steve Harris]
If you look back through the archives you'l see
that my attitude changed
form "yay, more features, cram them in" (luckily rained in by Paul and
Richard) to a more considered attitude.
and now we all have a solid 4 years of hands-on ladspa experience
showing what the standard lacks sorely.
we all agree, it seems, on what this is, so the danger of cramming in
features without consideration is reduced to the point of nothingness
i think.
having those extended features in a header or in RDF is an
insignificant distinction:
if we do it, we must support it in the future no matter whether it is
written in .h or .rdf.
(my apologies
offered, Steve, for this rude, amateur public attempt at
understanding your motives.)
Heh, all good fun :)
thanks, it's a relief to read that.
vriendelijk,
tim