24 Apr
2006
24 Apr
'06
8:26 p.m.
On 4/25/06, Hans Fugal <hans(a)fugal.net> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 at 08:57 +0100, Steve Harris
wrote:
Me too.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 06:40:32 -0400, Dave
Robillard wrote:
Well then let me weigh in. I have in the past cursed the insensibility
of referencing a port with its arbitrary (from the human's POV)
numerical ID. I want human-friendly port IDs. For the sake of the record, it's been duked
out on IRC and Steve
wins :). (Specifically, ports will be required to have a unique string
ID, but it will live in the data file, not the code).
Actually I didn't mean to say that they /will/ be required, just that I
don't have a problem with it. I've not heard anyone else speak in favour
of this, and it is a feature. If theres a critical mass of support I'm OK
with adding it, as it should make the lives of some hosts much easier.