10 May
2007
10 May
'07
12:58 p.m.
On 10 May 2007, at 08:35, Richard Spindler wrote:
2007/5/10, Dave Robillard
<drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca>ca>:
I don't support it unless someone has a representation issue. You're
not like to see if (fs == 44100) anyway, and if you did you'd want to
hedge a bit: if (fs > 44090 && fs < 44110). If you have to write if
(fs_num / fs_denom == 44100) then things are bit dodgy anyway.
Whew, a lot of ifs.
- Steve
Regarding the one sensible thing you /have/ said:
is sample rate
as a
double sufficient, or is there a good reason for numerator/
denominator
using a double as samplerate is highly undesirable, because for
example someone might want to test for specific samplerates, like
if ( samplerate == 44100) { ... }
And this cannot be done with a float value with the necessary
"exactness". ;-)
I do support the proposal to use two integer values.