6 Nov
2005
6 Nov
'05
8:08 a.m.
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 04:01:00PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 03 Nov 2005 21:58, torbenh(a)gmx.de wrote:
i was not aware of this.
i cant get the sourcecode of netjack-osx because the j sf cvs services are
down... always release source tarballs.
ok... now i think this namechoice was REALLY bad.
i believe, that both projects work differently.
anybody can tell me how the sync is done ?
we need a new project name:
fast.
project can be found using google.
no real conflicts.
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:18:23AM -0700,
seablade(a)softhome.net wrote:
> Heh I really should get my head checked, my memory is going on me, so yea
> I looked into NetJack, it is for Linux;)
You don't need to get your head checked. The unfortunate truth is that there
are two more or less unrelated netjack projects, one is for MacOS, one is for
Linux.
As Torben points out I did get it to work with PPC Linux (to some degree
atleast) but it won't work with MacOS.
The network-transport mechanism is not the same between the two so it won't
work using macosx-netjack <--> linux-netjack either, atleast not for the
moment.
Regards,
Robert
--
http://spamatica.se/musicsite/
--
torben Hohn
http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language
So if the
author is reading
this I may be able to give you some feedback soon on if it works
crossplatform(x86 Linux to PPC Mac).
However is there a way to get more than a stereo pair going back and
forth, or am I limited in that function for right now?
Seablade
robert jonssen has a mac and implemented the endianess stuff.
my current work in cvs does not convert everything. i will fix this
soon. but i am focussing on getting the transport sync between the hosts
working.
it is definitely a goal to make it work cross platform.
because i intend to make some jam session with a friend of mine who will
return in january to germany....
in the mean time i need testers who verify cross-platform.
and yes you are currently limited to 2 channels because stupid me
hardcoded the 2 in some places i did not tidy up yet.
but if you use 100mbit 4 channels should be possible without any
drawbacks.
step by step. i dont have much spare time :(