22 Feb
2006
22 Feb
'06
11:32 p.m.
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 13:27 +0200, Hannu Savolainen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Lets see, taking property. By property, I guess you mean the intellectual
property, but isn't what they do exactly, is to copy the intellectual
property, not taking it? Because you still have it, perhaps unless someone
else claims to be the creator. Well, its just a definition, but I can't agree
its stealing. Work is work regardless of it's type. You cannot think that you
use just a
copy of someone's work when it's in form of "intellectual property".
Instead you are using part of the whole work.
Intellectual property is not somathing that drops from the heaven. When
you use intellectual property somebody has spent maybe years on creating
it. He expects to get paid for that work. Since the price of a copy cannot
be too high he would expect to sell certain number of copies (say N). If
you are using a "copy" of the work you in fact have stolen 1/Nth of
the time author spent when creating it.
If you run out from barber's shop without paying it's very clearly a
crime. You have stolen 1/N of barber's monthly salary. Is there anything
that makes 1/Nth if artist's or programmer's salary less criminal than
stealing 1/Nth of barber's salary?
If you don't like the model of selling intellectual property then your
moral right is to refuse using such work. But I don't think you have any
rights to use the work without paying.
Great analogy! That's it exactly.
--
Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner
The Fuzzy Dice
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/fuzzy.html
"As we enjoy great advantages from the invention of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and
this we should do freely and generously."
Benjamin Franklin, on declining patents offered by the governor of
Pennsylvania for his "Pennsylvania Fireplace", c. 1744
> > Why don't you want to distinct between
copyright violation
> > (which is
> > a gray area, different from country to country) and stealing?
> >
>
> First, because I personally do consider it stealing, and second,
>
But why do you consider it stealing?
Because you are taking someone's property without paying them for it.