On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 00:41 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov
wrote:
David Robillard <dave(a)drobilla.net>
writes:
Some random web tool having a crappy output
layout format is hardly the
fault of LV2, raptor, Turtle, or anything else but that tool, obviously.
Yes, I got that the tool I use is crappy. How ignoring the problem
solves it? I havent said that it is LV2 fault. I complained about
evident turtle/xmlrdf schism. And I declared that I dont want to
participate in web 2.0 wars. I have better things to do.
I don't know. Perhaps there is a better visualizer out there? If you
are attached to this thing and consider it important (for some reason I
really don't understand) then just maintain the document in a way that
works well with it and automatically convert to turtle, instead of the
other way around.
As far as the 'schism' goes, turtle is a W3C 'team submission' now, on
track to be a recommendation with a registered MIME type and all that.
Support is pretty widespread, and increasing. It's not really a schism,
absolutely everybody despises the mess that is rdf/xml ;)
Thanks for being constructive. I've used doap:implements to link project
with host applications. Is it appropriate? Here is the output of rapper,
contains some strange stuff but the host-info seems to be fine.
If this ttl is suitable for use in the extension matrix, I'll dig the
changelog and describe extension support changes though releases.
--
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>