On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 02:03 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
David Robillard <dave(a)drobilla.net> writes:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 00:41 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov
wrote:
David Robillard <dave(a)drobilla.net>
writes:
Some random web tool having a crappy output
layout format is hardly the
fault of LV2, raptor, Turtle, or anything else but that tool, obviously.
Yes, I got that the tool I use is crappy. How ignoring the problem
solves it? I havent said that it is LV2 fault. I complained about
evident turtle/xmlrdf schism. And I declared that I dont want to
participate in web 2.0 wars. I have better things to do.
I don't know. Perhaps there is a better visualizer out there? If you
are attached to this thing and consider it important (for some reason I
really don't understand) then just maintain the document in a way that
works well with it and automatically convert to turtle, instead of the
other way around.
As far as the 'schism' goes, turtle is a W3C 'team submission' now, on
track to be a recommendation with a registered MIME type and all that.
Support is pretty widespread, and increasing. It's not really a schism,
absolutely everybody despises the mess that is rdf/xml ;)
Thanks for being constructive. I've used doap:implements to link project
with host applications. Is it appropriate? Here is the output of rapper,
contains some strange stuff but the host-info seems to be fine.
If there's good DOAP docs I don't know where they are... I should
probably twiddle lv2specgen to work with non-lv2 things and generate
some some documentation pages for commonly used vocabularies like doap
too...
Anyway. I didn't know about that predicate, maybe it should be used in
host-info.
That doesn't seem like a proper usage to me. From the doap vocab:
(doap:implements) "A specification that a project implements. Could be a
standard, API or legally defined level of conformance.". Doesn't really
apply to a program contained in a project.
I don't see a more appropriate predicate in doap though. There should
be a doap:subProject...
http://lists.usefulinc.com/pipermail/doap-interest/2004-September/000096.ht…
From 2004 :/
You could just use rdfs:seeAlso I suppose, though that has a bit less
meaning.
P.S. You have a file: URI as the URI for zynjacku there
If this ttl is suitable for use in the extension
matrix, I'll dig the
changelog and describe extension support changes though releases.
I think it needs to be supportsFeature rather than supportsExtension, I
didn't realize it until starting work on the tool :/
I'll put together something more coherent and sort out the vocabulary
tomorrow some time
-dr