18 May
2013
18 May
'13
1:38 p.m.
i must confess : i'm also using jack session :-)
however, i'm happy to switch to whatever other manager if that one covers
the jacksession functionality
guess i really have to give it a try then
grtz
Thijs
2013/5/18 rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com>
On 05/15/2013 11:12 PM, David Santamauro wrote:
--
follow me on my Audio & Linux blog <http://audio-and-linux.blogspot.com/> !
On 05/15/2013 02:41 PM, Dan wrote:
Are you saying that you guys are plain (outside Ladish) Jack-Session users?
I don't think this will get announced officially, Jack-Session is out
there, do with it what you want, but don't expect heavily development on it
like you see with NSM.
By the way, I used Laborejo in NSM today and it used the 'optional GUI'
functionality in the NSM protocol. This is just great! I was thinking a few
days ago 'all those small apps on your desktop is an disadvantage of
one-task-one-tool. You can hide plugin.'
But this hide/show GUI option seems to solve just that!
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/**API.html#n:1.2.4.1<http://non.tuxfamily.o…
Regards,
\r
______________________________**_________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.**linuxaudio.org<Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/**listinfo/linux-audio-dev<http://lists.linu…
To my knowledge (from direct IRC interaction with
e.g. torben hohn)
Very good question. Where are the tides swelling?
there is
very little interest by the original jack-session devs to continue,
support
and fix it.
Just from reading LAD I did not realize that. Is this (de-facto)
deprecation documented anywhere?