1 May
2013
1 May
'13
11:40 a.m.
Hi LADs,
It great to notice that the list of Non-Session-Manager (NSM) support is
growing, thanks!
Ardour 3, Carla, Qtractor Zita-rev1, Laborejo, Qmidiarp are examples of
apps which just got NSM support. AMS and Qmidiroute are WIP. (For a more
extended list, see below).
The nice thing about Carla, is that you can use LV2 plugins (and dssi,
sfz, gig, sf2, vst) as standalone jack apps in NSM now. So yes, LV2
plugins are also useful for working with a more modular approach.
Of course it would be nice if more developers start to support NSM in
their apps, most notable the nicest 'Jack standalone' apps imho:
- Rakarrack
- PHASEX
- Ingen
- Guitarix
- Giada and/or Kluppe (?) (JackTransport would be nice too)
- HarmonySEQ
- Muse
- Hydrogen
- ...
- ...
I'm sure I forgot quite a few...
Thanks in advance :)
\r
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/Non%20Session%20Manager
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/ApplicationsSupportingNsm
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/NsmPatches
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html
15 May
15 May
4:27 p.m.
Hi,
FYI Qmidiarp and AMS has nsm support now.
ams: https://github.com/royvegard/ams
On 05/01/2013 11:38 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
- Rakarrack
- PHASEX
- Ingen
- Guitarix
- Giada and/or Kluppe (?) (JackTransport would be nice too)
- HarmonySEQ
- Muse
- Hydrogen
- ...
- ...
I'm sure I forgot quite a few...
From the above projects, Rakarrack doesn't seems to be actively
developed. So if an dev outside the project wants to add nsm support,
you're welcome. (That's true for all Linuxaudio software I guess :) )
I'm not sure whether there're (technically/workflow) reasons to add nsm
support if there's already an plugin (LV2/DSSI) version of it. Assuming
the plugin version has no limitations compared to the standalone
version, you can use the plugin version in plugin hosts with nsm support
(Carla atm). If you think it would make a difference, I'd be interested
for your argumentation.
Best regards,
\r
4:36 p.m.
On 05/01/2013 11:38 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi LADs,
It great to notice that the list of Non-Session-Manager (NSM) support is
growing, thanks!
Ardour 3, Carla, Qtractor Zita-rev1, Laborejo, Qmidiarp are examples of
apps which just got NSM support. AMS and Qmidiroute are WIP. (For a more
extended list, see below).
The nice thing about Carla, is that you can use LV2 plugins (and dssi,
sfz, gig, sf2, vst) as standalone jack apps in NSM now. So yes, LV2
plugins are also useful for working with a more modular approach.
Of course it would be nice if more developers start to support NSM in
their apps, most notable the nicest 'Jack standalone' apps imho:
- Rakarrack
- PHASEX
- Ingen
- Guitarix
- Giada and/or Kluppe (?) (JackTransport would be nice too)
- HarmonySEQ
- Muse
- Hydrogen
- ...
- ...
I'm sure I forgot quite a few...
Yes, Yoshimi for instance ;) I'll take another look at
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/yoshimi-nsm.patch and dig up the discussion
again about jack-session vs NSM. The aforementioned patch namely removes
all jack-session support and I'm not sure if I want that.
Regards,
Jeremy
5:35 p.m.
jack-session is specified by jack itself and supported by other
session managers (e.g. ladish), so indeed, please don't drop
jack-session.
OTOH it's good to have NSM as an addition.
On 5/15/13, Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy(a)autostatic.com> wrote:
On 05/01/2013 11:38 AM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi LADs,
It great to notice that the list of Non-Session-Manager (NSM) support is
growing, thanks!
Ardour 3, Carla, Qtractor Zita-rev1, Laborejo, Qmidiarp are examples of
apps which just got NSM support. AMS and Qmidiroute are WIP. (For a more
extended list, see below).
The nice thing about Carla, is that you can use LV2 plugins (and dssi,
sfz, gig, sf2, vst) as standalone jack apps in NSM now. So yes, LV2
plugins are also useful for working with a more modular approach.
Of course it would be nice if more developers start to support NSM in
their apps, most notable the nicest 'Jack standalone' apps imho:
- Rakarrack
- PHASEX
- Ingen
- Guitarix
- Giada and/or Kluppe (?) (JackTransport would be nice too)
- HarmonySEQ
- Muse
- Hydrogen
- ...
- ...
I'm sure I forgot quite a few...
Yes, Yoshimi for instance ;) I'll take another look at
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/yoshimi-nsm.patch and dig up the discussion
again about jack-session vs NSM. The aforementioned patch namely removes
all jack-session support and I'm not sure if I want that.
Regards,
Jeremy
Thanks in advance :)
\r
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/Non%20Session%20Manager
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/ApplicationsSupportingNsm
http://non.tuxfamily.org/wiki/NsmPatches
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
5:42 p.m.
On Wed, 15 May 2013 18:35:09 +0300
Dan <danmbox(a)gmail.com> wrote:
jack-session is specified by jack itself and supported
by other
session managers (e.g. ladish), so indeed, please don't drop
jack-session.
OTOH it's good to have NSM as an addition.
To my knowledge (from direct IRC interaction with e.g. torben hohn) there is very little
interest by the original jack-session devs to continue, support and fix it.
The moment I heard that I decided for me that the only viable option for session
management is NSM.
Nils
11:12 p.m.
On 05/15/2013 02:41 PM, Dan wrote:
Very good question. Where are the tides swelling?
David
To my
knowledge (from direct IRC interaction with e.g. torben hohn) there is
very little interest by the original jack-session devs to continue, support
and fix it.
Just from reading LAD I did not realize that. Is this (de-facto)
deprecation documented anywhere?
18 May
18 May
11:48 a.m.
On 05/15/2013 11:12 PM, David Santamauro wrote:
On 05/15/2013 02:41 PM, Dan wrote:
Very good question. Where are the tides swelling?
Are you saying that you guys are plain (outside Ladish) Jack-Session users?
I don't think this will get announced officially, Jack-Session is out
there, do with it what you want, but don't expect heavily development on
it like you see with NSM.
By the way, I used Laborejo in NSM today and it used the 'optional GUI'
functionality in the NSM protocol. This is just great! I was thinking a
few days ago 'all those small apps on your desktop is an disadvantage of
one-task-one-tool. You can hide plugin.'
But this hide/show GUI option seems to solve just that!
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html#n:1.2.4.1
Regards,
\r
To my
knowledge (from direct IRC interaction with e.g. torben hohn)
there is
very little interest by the original jack-session devs to continue,
support
and fix it.
Just from reading LAD I did not realize that. Is this (de-facto)
deprecation documented anywhere?
1:38 p.m.
i must confess : i'm also using jack session :-)
however, i'm happy to switch to whatever other manager if that one covers
the jacksession functionality
guess i really have to give it a try then
grtz
Thijs
2013/5/18 rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com>
On 05/15/2013 11:12 PM, David Santamauro wrote:
--
follow me on my Audio & Linux blog <http://audio-and-linux.blogspot.com/> !
On 05/15/2013 02:41 PM, Dan wrote:
Are you saying that you guys are plain (outside Ladish) Jack-Session users?
I don't think this will get announced officially, Jack-Session is out
there, do with it what you want, but don't expect heavily development on it
like you see with NSM.
By the way, I used Laborejo in NSM today and it used the 'optional GUI'
functionality in the NSM protocol. This is just great! I was thinking a few
days ago 'all those small apps on your desktop is an disadvantage of
one-task-one-tool. You can hide plugin.'
But this hide/show GUI option seems to solve just that!
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/**API.html#n:1.2.4.1<http://non.tuxfamily.o…
Regards,
\r
______________________________**_________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.**linuxaudio.org<Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/**listinfo/linux-audio-dev<http://lists.linu…
To my knowledge (from direct IRC interaction with
e.g. torben hohn)
Very good question. Where are the tides swelling?
there is
very little interest by the original jack-session devs to continue,
support
and fix it.
Just from reading LAD I did not realize that. Is this (de-facto)
deprecation documented anywhere?
3:31 p.m.
On 05/18/2013 01:37 PM, Thijs van severen wrote:
i must confess : i'm also using jack session :-)
But you're coming from far, Garageband wasn't it (o no that was a friend
of yours right)? ;)
Anyway, floss development can be fast, very fast. Rui implemented 'nsm
optional-gui' functionality in qtractor and his v1 stuff already, oh my! :)
Thanks!
\r
20 May
20 May
6:42 p.m.
I have no idea who controls the various web-sites that still promote
things like LASH (e.g. on nongnu), but I do know that Jack devs use
doxygen and should add deprecation warnings to the jack-session pages.
On 5/18/13, rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 05/18/2013 01:37 PM, Thijs van severen wrote:
i must confess : i'm also using jack session
:-)
But you're coming from far, Garageband wasn't it (o no that was a friend
of yours right)? ;)
Anyway, floss development can be fast, very fast. Rui implemented 'nsm
optional-gui' functionality in qtractor and his v1 stuff already, oh my! :)
Thanks!
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
7:30 p.m.
jack-session is NOT deprecated.
conversations with the one known in this thread as rosea.grammostola
indicated that not much more work is likely on jack-session at any time in
the near future, but given that almost all development work that changes
the JACK API has been absent for a couple of years, this is hardly a
surprise.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Dan <danmbox(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have no idea who controls the various web-sites that
still promote
things like LASH (e.g. on nongnu), but I do know that Jack devs use
doxygen and should add deprecation warnings to the jack-session pages.
On 5/18/13, rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 05/18/2013 01:37 PM, Thijs van severen wrote:
:)
i must confess : i'm also using jack session
:-)
But you're coming from far, Garageband wasn't it (o no that was a friend
of yours right)? ;)
Anyway, floss development can be fast, very fast. Rui implemented 'nsm
optional-gui' functionality in qtractor and his v1 stuff already, oh my!
Thanks!
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
15 May
15 May
5:51 p.m.
On 05/15/2013 04:36 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
Yes, Yoshimi for instance ;) I'll take another look at
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/yoshimi-nsm.patch and dig up the discussion
again about jack-session vs NSM. The aforementioned patch namely removes
all jack-session support and I'm not sure if I want that.
I don't think Jack-Session is used much these days, tell me if I'm
wrong. If they still exist, I would challenge the JS users to try NSM,
good chance you'll prefer the latter.
If JS is used, it's used within Ladish I think. Remember that Ladish
will support nsm in the future.
However, I don't think JS needs to be removed to add nsm support.
There're more apps which supports both (e.g. added JS first and then
switched to NSM without removing JS). Removal of JS might be better for
tactical reasons though. You can argue that it's better for the LAU/LAD
community if there's one session API to support.
Best regards,
\r
7:34 p.m.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy(a)autostatic.com>wrote;wrote:
Yes, Yoshimi for instance ;) I'll take
another look at
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/yoshimi-nsm.patch and dig up the discussion
again about jack-session vs NSM. The aforementioned patch namely removes
all jack-session support and I'm not sure if I want that.
I only removed Jack Session in that patch out of convenience and having
been in the habit of removing LASH support from things. It should be fairly
easy for whoever applies the patch to avoid removing JS. I'm not likely to
do it though, as I no longer have a use for yoshimi.
4002
days inactive
4021
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
13 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Dan -
David Santamauro -
J. Liles -
Jeremy Jongepier -
Nils Gey -
Paul Davis -
rosea.grammostola -
Thijs van severen