18 Dec
2007
18 Dec
'07
5:46 p.m.
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 18:27 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
Krzysztof Foltman <wdev(a)foltman.com> writes:
OK, good - didn't think so (didn't add one myself, no. quite the
opposite...)
-DR-
Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
Looks like I was wrong - you're assuming that starting jackd manually
would case that starter process to wait until it's manually stopped,
like jackd did before?
There is no such thing as starter process implemented. By me - for
sure. From what I've understood from Dave's patch - by him too. So having
jackd behave in orthagonal way is not confusing? Like, jackd
process is running, why my apps cannot connect?!?!?
In normal situations, this
jackd process (the launcher) would be only
short-lived (less than a second).