1 Apr
2011
1 Apr
'11
2:20 a.m.
Hello,
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 04:25:45 pm Conrad Berhörster
wrote:
Hi gerald,
Op den Middeweken 30 März 2011 Klock 09:45:16 hett Gerald
Mwangi schreven:
> Thanx all, tritium looks very much like my own
> preliminary design. One question, does it mask JACK so
> that I only have to use the Tritium API (only
> JACK-Audio, not Midi)?
Well, yes and no. :-) Tritium is very modular (and
becoming more so).
For example, the Tritium::MixerImpl class we talked about --
it just manages and mixes buffers. It doesn't directly
interface to any audio API's. The audio API's are pretty
modular, but not quite ready for "general purpose" use.
Meanwhile Tritium::Engine sets up the whole sequencer engine
and takes care of JACK for you... but that's not what you
want.
> I also don't see any support for
Inserts/plugins in the
> channel class. Am I wrong?
At the moment it's handled like an old mixer board where you
have 4 send/returns and you mix in each channel to go to it.
This is inherited from Hydrogen, and I haven't decided if I
want to do per-channel pre/post insers.
i think, tritium is a little bit to big for your
needs.
Too big? I disagree.
Too immature? Yes, indeed! :-)
further , it depends on QT,
It only depends on QtCore and QtXml... which isn't /that/
bad. :-)
has all this midi stuff an
lots of song/player logic.
...which can be omitted if you application doesn't use it.
-gabriel