3 Jun
2003
3 Jun
'03
9:11 a.m.
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:30:52AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
Agreed. There are a number of ways to solve this, but
sadly they all
require a significant ammount of effort, and there are always some
importnat things to be done...
A laso kinda like the UI melange effect you get on VST systems, though
some of hte UIs are truely awful.
Luckily the correlation between musical quality and visual
quality isn't always that big :)
Well, theres the chameleon (sp?), but that isn;t a
card, so wont lett you
accelerate just inner loops.
Its very nice, and it's rack mountable, which is a
big plus.
It would be a nice thing but its hard for DSP
card manufacturers to compete with CPU+mothboard guys in the
price/performance stakes, because the volume is so low.
Yeah, hence the phenomenal
prices.
I keep seeing hints that th next generation of
motherboards might include
some sort of DSP capability, and theres always graphics cards, which have
pretty meaty DSP capabilities.
That would be nice.
They can throw out all the stupid tubes and put in DSPs instead.
(who had the idea to put a tube onto a mainboard ???)
+ suspend to ram for a standby mode. Linux recoveres
from S2R very
quickly.
nice :) haven't tried it yet, but will do.
I hope the upcoming kernel release will be good to us,
though I think Paul recently raised some issues which still
had to be addressed ?
If we need to start lobbying, now is certainly the time
to get fixes in till 2.6 ... (of course nothing really big,
but maybe there is small stuff which needs to be fixed too ?).
Don't have much time now to test the 2.5.x series though :(
regards,
v