28 Nov
2004
28 Nov
'04
3:02 p.m.
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 19:53, Jan Depner wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
Do you mean the ALSA developers? Audioscience does its drivers for ALSA,
no volunteers needed. :)
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
Why don't the guys who do the driver development see if audioscience [Marek Peteraj]
Ah i don't know. I mean, you guys have put a lot of time into what your
doing anyway. And in my case the trust in rme turned out to be a bummer
just becasue i was thinking that they have trust in the open source
developers. If they did have such trust, something like this would never
happen. Once again, the simple answer is www.audioscience.com.
> RME has provided
> "Pro" grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
> in order to become a legitimate alternative to
> proprietary solutions.
Not really. It was Paul, Thomas, and one other guy(don't remember the
name) who did. Remember it was almost no investment from RME's side.
A not uncommon belief has it that the investment called 'trust' is
worth more than any monetary investment. would be interested in producing pro audio cards (not
just broadcast)
with driver help from the OS community. They seem like they have their
act together.
Seems like a good idea to me. The 5044 cards offers 8 analog i/os of
24/192 and i wonder whether such card could not already be used for
studio purposes.
But in any case, they're very close.
Marek