9 May
2007
9 May
'07
2:42 p.m.
On 9 May 2007, at 17:19, Dave Robillard wrote:
Probably, but sometimes you just have to be realistic. I'm happy to
go with double sample rates if no one screams. I've had a quick look
at my code and it should be an easy transition - the most common
thing I do with the sample rate is cast it to a float or double and
store it somewhere anyway.
- Steve
Optional support for fundament things is not a
solution.
None of the things you have mentioned have any /actual/ reason to
go in
LV2 itself, except the sample rate issue which does need to be figured
out. I'm for making it a rational number or double; locking it as an
int for no reason when there's any reason for something better at
all is
short-sighted.
I do think I vaguely remember some reason why floating point sample
rates aren't good though.... ?